As a beta user of Scrivener 3 by Literature and Latte for the last two years, I was excited to see Literature and Latte announce its release.
Before we go into the improvements Scrivener 3 brings to Windows users (the Mac version has been out for a while), let’s step back.
What’s Scrivener?
In my 2019 post: Review: Using Scrivener for Family History and Memoir Writing, I introduced Scrivener and described its version 1 thusly:
Scrivener is a writing software that helps writers organize research, notes, and drafts, or, as Scrivener puts it, “See the forest or the trees.” It can even help with storyboarding.
Literature and Latte, the architects of Scrivener 3, claim “It’s for writing. And writing. And writing.”
I’d suggest a friendly amendment: “It’s for writing. And organizing your thoughts. And keeping your research handy.”
In their review of Scrivener 3, PC Magazine writes (rightly, in my opinion), “Scrivener is the best writing app for long-form writers because they built it with their needs in mind.”
Make no mistake. Scrivener 3 is no small writing app. Literature and Latte, the company “founded by writers for writers,” has produced a robust software. Anything that powerful is complex. I have used it for years, but it took a while before I was aware of all its features. That said, even using only 40% of its capabilities, I loved it.
What’s New in Scrivener 3
For a full explanation of Scrivener 3’s features and improvements over version 1, read Literature and Latte’s blog post, Introducing Scrivener 3 for Windows. They highlight Scrivener 3’s improvements in the following graphic:
I’ll spotlight the changes that have stood out to me.
Redesign of Compile Feature
The more flexible and friendlier compile feature is a big deal. Writers can select which parts of their manuscripts they want to export and can choose the format. This includes epub3, an open standard digital book format.
I haven’t used the export to Kindle, but reviewers seem to agree that it’s improved. Judging from my Detroit Working Writers buddies, if there is one thing that writers and authors all seem to struggle with, it’s exporting their work into Kindle’s format.
Scrivener 3’s Writing Tools
There’s no doubt that the enhanced outlining is a big benefit. Along with it comes more color coding and labeling. This is fabulous not only for planning, but for revising.
Writers who use dialogue will appreciate Scrivener 3’s linguistic focus function. (Edit – Writing Tools). It fades out the non-dialogue text, so you can focus on your characters’ conversations.
It also offers a “Tidying Up” function to convert all the double-spaces at the ends of sentences to a single space. That’s helpful to those of us who have double tapped the space bar for decades.
Writing Statistics
Scrivener 3’s writing stats is like having a year-round NaNoWriMo. You can set goals and measure your progress towards them.
Nathan Dylan Goodwin, the most productive author I know, does exactly that as he writes his best-selling genealogical crime mysteries. Nathan explains:
I set a project target, which helps me determine an approximate number of words to write per day. I do like to try to beat the target but that isn’t always possible obviously! It’s fun to share the milestones with readers. This itself is motivating—I can look back and see how long the last ten thousand words took me to write.[1]
There are also options for those of us that aren’t great at goal setting, as Scrivener’s blog article, Let Me Count The Ways, describes. You can do anything from looking at your daily writing stats to auditing the word frequency in a chapter or manuscript. You can also tell Scrivener to ignore common words like and, the, said, asked as it calculates word frequency.
What Else I love about Scrivener 3
Custom Icons
It seems like a little thing, but I love the ability to set custom icons in my binders. For example, in my novel drafts, I use icons for scenes that need work, random ideas I have about the plot, and my to dos. I also draft and track with my speaking proposals in Scrivener. The ones that were successful get a lectern icon. The rejects get a thumbs down. The custom icons help me figure out where to place my energies with new calls.
It’s a software, not a subscription.
I love that they have kept with the software download model instead of a cloud-based subscription.
Scrivener’s beta program
Literature and Latte made it easy to join the beta program. I only had to write and explain how much I loved Scrivener’s version 1 and how impatient I was for the update. That meant I was able to get on board two years early.
The beta forum was very responsive to bugs and issues. Though it took a long time to release Scrivener 3, they didn’t do it until they had it bug free.
What I don’t love
I still find Scrivener formatting clunky. Maybe I’m just stuck in my ways, but my preferred workflow is to compose individual scenes in MS Word and copy and paste them into the Scrivener binder. This way I can use my MS-Office add-ins such as ProWritingAid to proofread and edit.
In particular, ProWritingAid’s checks on echoes and close repeats far outshines Scrivener’s word frequency app. (If you’re not familiar with ProWritingAid, see Editing Software Comparison: Grammarly vs ProWritingAid vs Ginger vs Hemmingway.)
Should you Purchase Scrivener 3?
Yes, even if there were no free trial or 49% reduced price for Scrivener 1 users, $49 is a very reasonable price for such a useful program.
But, if you’re new to the software, certainly take advantage of the trial first. If you’re like me, a Scrivener 1 user with no idea what my license number was, they have a handy lost license recovery link: https://www.literatureandlatte.com/lost-licence-recovery
Your Turn
Have you used Scrivener 3 or version 1? How do you like it? Would you recommend it to other?
1] Via Facebook Private Message, April 15, 2021
I quite like it – have been using the Beta and then Release Candidate for almost a year now. Interestingly enough, however, I find the new Compile MORE confusing than the old one – it doesn’t seem as flexible to me. I can’t seem to compile something that works really well for me. Perhaps I’m just doing it incorrectly.
Overall, though, it’s great – my entire blog is stored there and I love being able to find what I need quickly. I do compose each blog post in Scrivener, then compile each one to rtf to copy and paste into WordPress, generally because I’ll have lots of endnotes and those don’t paste well directly from Scrivener.
That’s interesting to know. I haven’t been using it much.
I’ve thought about using it to organize my blog research as well.
I have a problem with the new compiler. Many styles got lost (e.g. in the as is function) and it is much more cumbersome than in Scrivener 1.
There is an active user and test group. I would recommend joining the forum and seeing if someone can trouble shot your issue.
I was looking for replacement for Microsoft Word for my long form writing projects and quickly realized that Scrivener 3 is NOT it. I HATE Word but I would prefer to write a book in Word than use this abortion of an excuse for software called Scrivener 3. All I see are “glowing” reviews on blog and YouTube sites for Scrivener….they had to shell out a ton of cash to get these I’m sure as there is no other explanation for all of the awful non-features and missing word processing functions that Scrivener forces its users to work around and yet these never get mentioned in reviews ANYwhere.
I have used this software for a couple months now and I absolutely hate it and for good reason. You cannot format text like you can in a free word processor like Open Office or in paid software like Word. They like to say you can but I’m here to tell you that you can’t. Forget formatting lists in this garbageware. Scrivener 3 will format it as it sees fit and you will like it and just for fun, Scrivener will format it completely different under the exact same settings the next time you want a list. The format font is courier or Times and good luck trying to change that. Oh, you can change it alright, but it won’t matter as every new line you type will be in the Scriver 3 font – not the one that that rest of the document OR in the defaults settings which you changed originally. No, Scrivener 3 will type in the font it chooses – either Courier or Times and you will like it. Fake reviews and YouTube videos tell you to set up your styles in the “styles” pallet but good luck getting Scrivener to actually set the style consistently in the style you saved in the palette. Ultimately, you will be fighting formatting constantly.
There are no functions for increasing or decreasing indent unless you want to go back to using the tab key constantly and if you do this in a list? Fugitaboutit. Scrivener 3 will remove the line from your list altogether as it assumes you didn’t there anyway. It is awful software. Try to set the margins on Scrivener like you would on ANY free or paid word processing software. Go ahead, I’ll wait…can’t figure it out? That’s because you can’t do it. Scrivener 3 will set your margins as it sees fit and you will like it. Yes, the YouTube ladies will tell you that you can but good luck getting Scrivener to consistently set them and leave them. You’ll be fighting page setup constantly with this software. How about leading on the text or “line spacing” as many word processors call it? Can’t do that either. The whole document defaults to this weird 1.5 line spacing which is nearly impossible to change and keep changed. You’ll be fighting line spacing for your entire document.
This is an absolute travesty of an experience, I’ve never hated software this much since I was forced to switch to Apple Final Cut Pro X from version 7 in 2014. Scrivener is trying to be smart about all the ridiculous carnival features it thinks you would actually use and in reality, none of its developers have ever tried to write a long form project using their own software…that is obvious. I could go on and on about the failure to process inserts like tables and pics and how these are a nightmare to format in your work or how you can’t just add page breaks in a given paperback format or how you have to “complie” and can’t just print/export but that would be another two paragraphs. Suffice it to say, Scrivener 3 sucks and I highly recommend you avoid it at all costs. Currently there are still no decent alternatives to Word and maybe thats the idea behind this awful idea?
Thanks for your honest opinion and for reading.
Laura